Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Sitting on a Mountain of Crap, Wasting Time (repost)

[I am still pissed at the physics community and I am still venting my spleen. This is my third repost of this article.]

Theater of the Absurd

I love physics but I cannot stand physicists. No other field of science has more ass kissers and more blatant, in-your-face crackpottery. Just a couple of days ago, some crackpot physicist by the name of Nikodem Poplawski announced to the world that the universe is inside a wormhole, which is inside a black hole that lies within a much larger universe full of other black holes, wormholes, crackpot physicists and other universes. I swear I am not making any of this shit up. But this crap is common fare in the physics community. And only physicists can get away with going public with such absurdities.

A Mountain of Unadulterated Bullshit

As we all know, black holes and wormholes are based on Einstein's physics. The problem is that Einstein's physics is based on the existence of continuous structures and of a time dimension, both of which are pure unmitigated crackpottery. This crap is not even wrong because, as anybody with a lick of sense should know, a time dimension makes motion impossible. Moreover, continuity (infinite divisibility) is, of course, a pile of crap on the face of it because it leads to an infinite regress by definition. But these two turd examples only scratch the surface of the Himalayan-size mountain of bullshit on which modern physics is resting. Almost everything you learned in physics school is crap, from the Star-Trek voodoo fairy tales of time travel and multiple universes to the Einsteinian idea that only relative motion and position exist in the universe. It's all pure unadulterated bovine excrement. I need lots of synonyms for 'crap', I know.

Chicken Shit Voodoo Physics

Who will rise up to deliver us from this mountain of crap? Will it be the little con artist in the wheelchair over in England? I seriously doubt it. Stephen Hawking is one of the most prolific crap makers of them all. His shit stinks to high heaven even if his band of disciples and the clueless media love it so. I feel like vomiting every time I think about Hawking's chicken shit voodoo physics.


The situation in the physics community is so bleak that, lately, I am considering buying a rubber chicken to make my point. I will write 'Physicist' on it with a black marker pen and I will hang it by the neck at the entrance of my home. Why? Because all I read about lately is worthless chicken shit voodoo physics and chicken shit voodoo physicists like Hawking and Poplawski.
Please do me a favor. Don't write to tell me that you're offended because I don't care. I am the one who should be offended because I spent countless hours of my life learning a bunch of physics crap only to spend countless more hours unlearning it. Yes, I have been sitting on this mountain of crap most of my life, wasting my precious time. And I don't like it. The physics community owes me and everybody else an apology, goddammit. But thanks to the internet and computer engineering, none of which was made possible by wormhole physics, multiverses, time travel and other such crap, I can vent my spleen to my heart's content. I can crap all day long on their wormhole, black hole, Big Bang and time travel religion. It's the rebel in me. Isn't free speech grand?

I feel better now. Thank you.

See Also:

How Einstein Shot Physics in the Foot
Why Einstein's Physics Is Crap
Physics: The Problem With Motion
Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics
Nothing Can Move in Spacetime
D-Wave's Quantum Computing Crackpottery

5 comments:

B said...

So the question must be asked, what will it take to stop you sitting on this proverbial mountain?

To refer to an older post

“as any child can tell you that nothing can be its own opposite”

I presume you are talking about the physical? I know of at least one property that is its own opposite.

Also

“Strike another blow against all the crackpot physicists and mathematicians who stupidly believe in infinity and teach others to do the same.”

I think some things must be infinite otherwise we have the paradox below.

"… if everything that exists has a place, place too will have a place, and so on ad infinitum." Aristotle

I’m no smart man but if one quarter of what you say is true then this is still revolution to physics. So for the love of humanity, if you’re genuine then please give us some proof.

Louis Savain said...

So the question must be asked, what will it take to stop you sitting on this proverbial mountain?

A more interesting question is, What will it take for you stop being a gutless anonymous coward? Grow some gonads and identify yourself, goddammit.

I presume you are talking about the physical? I know of at least one property that is its own opposite.

Well, Haysoos Martinez! Don't leave me hanging. Come out with your crap so I can have some fun rubbing your nose in it.

I think some things must be infinite otherwise we have the paradox below.

"… if everything that exists has a place, place too will have a place, and so on ad infinitum." Aristotle


That's no paradox. That's plain false reasoning. You and Aristotle got it ass-backward. What he should have written is this: Since place leads to an infinite regress, it cannot possibly exist. It's very simple, really.

You should read my article Why Space (Distance) Is an Illusion for enlightenment. Also Why Infinity Is Infinitely (Almost) Stupid may do you some good.

I believe it was Kant who said "If space exists, where is it"? The answer should be obvious to anybody with two neurons between their ears and a minimum of gonads: space does not exist.

I’m no smart man but if one quarter of what you say is true then this is still revolution to physics. So for the love of humanity, if you’re genuine then please give us some proof.

The proof is staring you in the face but you're denying it, even though it's trivial. So you don't deserve more than that. Does humanity deserve more proof? It's not for me to decide.

And who is this "us" are you referring to? If you mean the scientific community, I should tell you that I don't write for scientists. I especially don't write for the physics community. They can kiss my ass. How about that?

stereox112 said...

You are a very interesting crackpot, aren't you?
I'll keep reading your blog, it's funny and it can be used as a training ground for debunking other crackpotery out there :)

B said...

Wow Louis, good job at alienating someone who agrees with you, but I guess I should not have expected more going by your past posts.

Grow some gonads and identify yourself, goddammit.

No, I don’t have too.

That's no paradox. That's plain false reasoning. You and Aristotle got it ass-backward. What he should have written is this: Since place leads to an infinite regress, it cannot possibly exist. It's very simple, really.

Good point, I did not think of it that way.

The proof is staring you in the face but you're denying it

Like I said I agree with you, there does appear to be too much popular culture in science and a lot of what they come up with seems quite unbelievable. I think it is time for a rethink.

Well, Haysoos Martinez! Don't leave me hanging. Come out with your crap so I can have some fun rubbing your nose in it.

Sorry I’m not Haysoos Martinez. Since I don’t owe you anything then you can figure it out, isn’t that the point of this blog…

Louis Savain said...

B wrote:

Wow Louis, good job at alienating someone who agrees with you, but I guess I should not have expected more going by your past posts.

Well, you sure have a funny way of agreeing with people. Next time you decide to play the devil's advocate, it might help if you say so beforehand.

Me: Grow some gonads and identify yourself, goddammit.

B: No, I don’t have too.


Of course not. But I like my friends to show some cojones.