Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Lattice Propulsion, Part II

Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV

Abstract

In Part I, I wrote about how my lattice research drove me to learn about ancient megalithic societies. In my opinion, some ancient peoples did have contact with alien beings who taught them the secret technology of stone levitation among other things. Along the way, I found out that ancient megalithic builders had a few things in common such as astronomy, iron mining and a love of secrecy and riddles. In this post, I explain why my search took me to South Florida and why this is somehow related to the Great Pyramid of Egypt. If you have not already done so, please read Physics: The Problem With Motion, Understanding the Lattice and Part I of this article before continuing.

Why Iron?

In the previous post, I wrote that one of the things that caught my attention when I first read about it was the discovery, in 1837, of an iron plate wedged in an inner joint inside the Great Pyramid of Egypt. Why is that important? Well, if you remember from an older post, I wrote that I had been using aluminum foils in my initial levitation experiments. It didn’t work. The reason, as I pointed out, is that I had no way of forcing the seraphim flying between the foils to move along parallel trajectories. Eventually, I began to suspect that the problem was with my choice of aluminum. As far as we know, the ancients had no knowledge of aluminum. I figured that, if they had levitation technology, they must have used a known material that could somehow channel a coherent beam of seraphim moving along parallel trajectories.

If certain materials have magnetic properties, it would not be too farfetched to suppose that they might have one or more special electrostatic properties as well. After all, both electrostatic and magnetic fields involve the emission and absorption of seraphim. Of course, there are four different types of seraphim to deal with but an electrostatic charge still involves a type of seraphim. What if iron had special electrostatic properties in addition to its magnetic ones? At that point, owing to my years of failure, I was beginning to develop an aversion to half-baked experiments. I wanted to be sure. So I decided to do a search on the Internet to find instances where iron might have been involved in stone levitation in the past. My search soon led me to a man named Edward Leedskalnin.

Edward Leedskalnin Had a Little Secret

Ed Leedskalnin was a fascinating human being. A Latvian immigrant, he put his mark on the map of South Florida by erecting an amazing stone structure known as the Coral Castle, a tourist attraction near Homestead, southwest of Miami. Leedskalnin once famously claimed:
I have discovered the secrets of the pyramids, and have found out how the Egyptians and the ancient builders in Peru, Yucatan and Asia, with only primitive tools, raised and set in place blocks of stone weighing many tons!
That’s a rather interesting claim and one that would probably make the inventor either rich and famous or dead if it could be replicated. Ed was either lying or he was just a weird lone wolf inventor who did not care much about becoming rich. The claim could be easily dismissed if Ed had not supported it with actual evidence of his abilities: giant multi-ton blocks of coral stone erected into a massive albeit whimsical structure dedicated to his sweet sixteen. The scientific community wasted no time in dismissing Ed’s claim and calling him a crackpot and a loon, although I am not exactly sure on what basis. Their rejection, of course, was just what the rebel scientist in me needed to take the exact opposite view. To me, the very existence of the Coral Castle meant that Leedskalnin’s claim merited very careful investigation.

Something Big

I knew that Ed should have been taken seriously the moment I read about his strange infatuation with celestial alignments and the true cardinal directions. As I mentioned previously, I had long hypothesized that knowing the absolute axes of the universe was a necessary part of any lattice propulsion technology. But that’s not all of it. Ed once said, “I made more electricity with steel than I ever made with copper.” Wow. Steel is a form of iron, of course. So far so good, I thought to myself, but it could be better. It was then that I read the first sentence of Ed’s little book, Magnetic Current:
This writing is lined up so when you read it you look East, and all the description you will read about magnetic current, it will be just as good for your electricity.
Whoa! Hold on a second! Look east? Just as good for your electricity? Decades after he’s been dead and buried, Ed Leedskalnin had my full undivided attention. His prose is a little hard to decipher and I doubt that he really understood the theory behind his levitation technology, (he was close but he was no scholar, that’s for sure) but I think it’s important to delve a little into the meaning of that strange sentence. What Ed was really saying was that his description of magnetic current (including field orientation and current direction) is also valid for electricity but only if the reader (i.e., the experimenter) faces east. I remember jumping with excitement when I first understood this. From that point on, I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that the little Latvian immigrant, regardless of how nutty he may have been, was onto something big, something huge even. And then, suddenly, I realized that I understood the riddle of the Sphinx.

Why East?

Why is the Sphinx facing east? Well, that’s the real riddle of the Sphinx of Giza and the subject of my next post. There is a purpose and a plan to all this convoluted madness. Hang in there.

8 comments:

Teflon Don said...

At that point, owing to my years of failure, I was beginning to develop an aversion to half-baked experiments.

One could say the same of the (dwindling) readership of this blog.

Louis Savain said...

Teflon Don wrote:

One could say the same of the (dwindling) readership of this blog.

The readership of this blog should have no expectation whatsoever since they get it all for free. After all, there is plenty of alternative reading material on the web, right? Whining about anything is just that, whining.

Teflon Don said...

Does your indictment of whining also apply to your persecution complex relating to any and all forms of actual science?

Louis Savain said...

Yo, Teflon:

It's like this, man. I have the legal right to whine about science to my heart's content because a) I currently live in a free country, b) science is mostly funded by taxpayers and c) I am a taxpayer.

This blog does not get a single dime from either you or the public. This is why your whining is particularly offensive. As far as feeling persecuted by "any and all forms of actual science", I don't remember ever claiming to be persecuted by anybody or anything. And I would not use "science" to describe a community of jackasses who insist on denying the causality of motion. I am exercising my free speech right to vent my hostility toward the scientific community, especially the physics community.

If you don't like it, you know what you can do, don't you, Teflon? You can kiss my ass, that's what you can do. How about that?

Teflon Don said...

I don't mind your whining one bit. In fact, I find it amusing, and I find your ideas intriguing to say the least.

I might even be inclined to believe them if you posted any evidence more convincing than "it's perfectly obvious that I'm right".

As for taxpayer funding of science, well... I hate to break it to you, but taxpayers fund the internet too. You do know that's how the internet started, right? As separate government, military and university networks? Networks that are now being expanded through broadband lines laid with more taxpayer dollars?

Like your "science", your political philosophy has gaping logic holes.

Louis Savain said...

Teflon Don wrote:

I might even be inclined to believe them if you posted any evidence more convincing than "it's perfectly obvious that I'm right".

Eat shit, Teflon, whoever you are. I owe you nothing, asshole. And don't bother to reply unless you are ready to sign your crap with your real name and affiliation. Why? Because I prefer my readership to have some gonads, men and women. That's why.

Stephen said...

Wow, Don calls you out on evidence and your response is to call him an asshole. Someone call Brian Dunning. I think I am in the same boat as Don when I say that I wish what you had to say had any meaning, but it is all nonsense and bullshit.

Do real science or stop mucking about in hyperspace.

Louis Savain said...

Anonymous Stephen wrote:

Wow, Don calls you out on evidence and your response is to call him an asshole. Someone call Brian Dunning. I think I am in the same boat as Don when I say that I wish what you had to say had any meaning, but it is all nonsense and bullshit.

Do real science or stop mucking about in hyperspace.


Stephen, you too can eat shit, whoever you are. I owe you nothing and nobody calls me out on anything. I am not a politician and this is not a popularity contest. This is my show and I conduct it as I see fit. If you don't like it, you know what you can do. And who the hell is Brian Dunning?

You know, I'm getting tired of this shit. From now on, if you want to comment here, you'd better sign your comment with your real name and affiliation. Otherwise, your comment will be rejected. And, if you're a scientist, get ready to be abused. I don't like y'all. LOL.