Thursday, March 22, 2018

Sitting on a Mountain of Crap, Wasting Time (Repost)

Note: Below is a repost of an April 14, 2010 article that is sure to ruffle a few feathers but you know me. As always, I make no apologies to anyone.

Theater of the Absurd

I love physics but I cannot stand physicists. No other field of science has more ass kissers and more blatant, in-your-face crackpottery. Just a couple of days ago, some crackpot physicist by the name of Nikodem Poplawski announced to the world that the universe is inside a wormhole, which is inside a black hole that lies within a much larger universe full of other black holes, wormholes, crackpot physicists and other universes. I swear I am not making any of this shit up. But this crap is common fare in the physics community. And only physicists can get away with going public with such absurdities.

A Mountain of Unadulterated Bullshit

As we all know, black holes and wormholes are based on Einstein's physics. The problem is that Einstein's physics is based on the existence of continuous structures and of a time dimension, both of which are pure unmitigated crackpottery. This crap is not even wrong because, as anybody with a lick of sense should know, a time dimension makes motion impossible. Moreover, continuity (infinite divisibility) is, of course, a pile of crap on the face of it because it leads to an infinite regress by definition. But these two turd examples only scratch the surface of the Himalayan-size mountain of bullshit on which modern physics is resting. Almost everything you learned in physics school is crap, from the Star-Trek voodoo fairy tales of time travel and multiple universes to the Einsteinian idea that only relative motion and position exist in the universe. It's all pure unadulterated bovine excrement. I need lots of synonyms for 'crap', I know.

Chicken Shit Voodoo Physics

Who will rise up to deliver us from this mountain of crap? Will it be the little con artist in the wheelchair over in England? I seriously doubt it. Stephen Hawking is one of the most prolific crap makers of them all. His shit stinks to high heaven even if his band of disciples and the clueless media love it so. I feel like vomiting every time I think about Hawking's chicken shit voodoo physics.

The situation in the physics community is so bleak that, lately, I am considering buying a rubber chicken to make my point. I will write 'Physicist' on it with a black marker pen and I will hang it by the neck at the entrance of my home. Why? Because all I read about lately is worthless chicken shit voodoo physics and chicken shit voodoo physicists like Hawking and Poplawski.
Please do me a favor. Don't write to tell me that you're offended because I don't care. I am the one who should be offended because I spent countless hours of my life learning a bunch of physics crap only to spend countless more hours unlearning it. Yes, I have been sitting on this mountain of crap most of my life, wasting my precious time. And I don't like it. The physics community owes me and everybody else an apology, goddammit. But thanks to the internet and computer engineering, none of which was made possible by wormhole physics, multiverses, time travel and other such crap, I can vent my spleen to my heart's content. I can crap all day long on their wormhole, black hole, Big Bang and time travel religion. It's the rebel in me. Isn't free speech grand?

I feel better now. Thank you.

See Also:

Why Einstein's Physics Is Crap
Physics: The Problem With Motion
Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics
Nothing Can Move in Spacetime
D-Wave's Quantum Computing Crackpottery

Monday, March 19, 2018

Thinking of Moving to a New Platform

Just a quick note to announce that I am considering moving this blog to a new platform, possibly If anyone has an alternative suggestion, please comment below. Thanks.

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

There Is Only One Speed in the Universe, the Speed of Light. Nothing Can Move Faster or Slower

Note: This is a repost of a previous article. I thought I'd point out that Stephen Hawking, in spite of all his supposed brilliance, never noticed something about the universe that should be glaringly obvious to every physicist, especially one with his supposed high intelligence: There can only be one speed in the universe, the speed of light.

Quantum Jumps at the Speed of Light

The truth about the speed of light will surprise everybody, physicists and laymen alike. There is actually only one speed in the universe and that is the speed of light. Nothing can move faster or slower, period. A particle moves by making quantum jumps at the speed of light interspersed with rest periods. The duration of a rest period is equal to that of a jump. If a particle appears to move at half the speed of light, its motion actually consists of an equal number of jumps and rest periods. At the speed of light, it is all jumps and no rest periods. At ordinary speeds, a moving particle is at rest almost all the time with just a few jumps sprinkled in.

Contrary to the Claims of Relativists, There Is No Time Dimension

Why is there only one speed in the universe? Again, the actual reason will surprise. In spite of all the indoctrination and the incessant relativist propaganda we have been subjected to in the last one hundred years or so, there is no such thing as a time dimension. A time dimension would make motion impossible. Why? The short answer is that moving in time is self-referential. The slightly longer answer is that a change in time implies a velocity in time which would have to be given as v = dt/dt = 1, which is nonsense. This is why nothing can move in Einstein's spacetime and why spacetime is a block universe in which nothing happens. All that time travel through wormholes stuff is crackpottery, of course. But please do not mention this to Star Trek fanatics.

Since there is no time dimension, nature cannot calculate durations. This means that all jump durations are equal to a fundamental duration, which is the interval it takes a particle to move a fundamental distance, a very minute length that some believe is the Planck length. The interval is Planck time.

Nontemporality Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg of Crackpottery in Modern Physics

The non-existence of a time dimension explains other phenomena as well, such as why particle decay is probabilistic. But the crackpottery of spacetime goes much further: there is no space either. There exist only particles, their properties and their interactions. Everything else is either abstract or BS. Physics is a lot more interesting than any of us suspected.

See Also

Why Steven Carlip Is Mistaken about the Speed of Gravity or Why LIGO Is Still a Scam
Why LIGO Is a Scam

I Am No Fan of Stephen Hawking

Stephen Hawking Was in Serious Denial

I know this is not a popular opinion but I was no fan of Hawking. I am no fan of materialists who believe and teach others to believe that they have no souls and are just machines. I am no fan of people who believe that the universe created itself and that life sprung from inert dirt by chance. I am certainly no fan of any so-called physicist who believes and teaches others to believe that time travel is physically possible. Such a person is a crackpot and/or a charlatan in my view.

But this is not the end of Hawking. He is just asleep. As a Christian, I know that a day will come when his soul will be resurrected in a new body and he will learn the truth that he spent his entire life and career denying. May Yahweh have mercy on his soul.

And yes, I still mean every word of this article that I wrote eight years ago: Sitting on a Mountain of Crap, Wasting Time. Harsh words, yes. But I apologize to no one.

See Also:

Why Einstein's Physics Is Crap

Thursday, March 8, 2018

My Crazy Predictions About the Cerebral Cortex

I Did Not Get My knowledge of the Cortex from Neurobiology

This is a quick post for the benefit of the agnostics and believers among my readers. In my last few articles, I made highly specific predictions about the functional organization and the architecture or design of the cerebral cortex. Note that, although some of my predictions and explanations could be wrong (I am a researcher and I do make mistakes), these are not things that I could have learned from any available scientific literature. Neurobiologists do not know these things. No expert in the field understands what cortical columns and minicolumns do. They have absolutely no clue. They do have some knowledge about what type of sensory stimuli will activate certain columns but that's about it.

I Am Called a Crackpot But I Don't Care

I could not possibly have figured these things out on my own. I have neither the resources nor the education to conduct brain research. I am claiming that I get my knowledge from a completely unorthodox source. I am claiming that I figured these things out, not by researching the scientific literature, but by studying occult Biblical texts that are thousands of years old. This is the kind of claim that gets me branded a kook and a crackpot by people in both religious and scientific circles. But I don't care and you know why? Because I don't write for them. I am not trying to convince them that I am right because I don't value their opinion of me. I know who the real master of the universe is. They are not it. Not even close.

If I partake in conversations on the internet with non-believers, I do it just for the record. I write only for the believers who are searching for a sign. My personal message to them is that things are happening. Big things. We are getting close to the time of the end of this world order and the dawning of the next one. Rejoice! Above all, do not let the chaos and madness of the world get you down. It is going to get worse, much worse as we approach the end. Just hang in there. We got powerful forces on our side.

See Also:

Solving the Mysteries of Reciprocal Corticothalamic Feedback and Cortical Learning
Fast Cortical Learning Using Spike Timing

Sunday, February 25, 2018

Fast Cortical Learning Using Spike Timing


Previously, I argued that cortical feedback connections were essential to handling sensory uncertainty and to cortical learning. In this article, I delve further into how learning works in the cortex. But, first, a word about the Yin-Yang brain.

The Yin-Yang Brain and the Attention Problem

We must keep in mind that the cortex in each hemisphere of the brain actually consists of two mirror opposite hierarchies. That is to say, every cortical column has a complement or opposite column. Although logically linked, the two reside in separate but complementary hierarchies (trees). The same is true for the minicolumns within the columns. If a connection is made to one minicolumn, a complementary connection is automatically made to its opposite. This Yin-Yang architecture also applies to the thalamus (which is where elementary pattern detectors are) and the rest of the brain.

Yin-Yang Brain
The main reason for having a Yin-Yang brain is that we live in a Yin-Yang reality. It is for this reason that biological sensors and effectors come in complementary-opposite pairs. Another reason has to do with attention, the ability to focus on one object while ignoring all others. As I will explain in a future article, the brain has an efficient way to cluster a large number of elements to form a single object. Clustering is crucial to invariant object detection and ultimately to survival. This is an unsolved problem in mainstream AI. The brain uses precise timing to solve the problem: It assumes that all the elements that comprise an object are temporally correlated. The flaw in this solution is that opposite phenomena are not temporally correlated. For example, the motion of an object moving left in the field of view is not temporally correlated with its motion to the right. In fact, the two phenomena do not use the same sensors and pattern detectors. Thus the correlation is not temporal but logical. This is not something that is learned. The brain has innate neuronal mechanisms to handle Yin-Yang logic and thereby marry two opposites into one entity.

For the sake of clarity, I will assume in this article that there is only one hierarchy.

Function and Organization of Sequence Memory

The main function of sequence memory is to combine lots of small elementary patterns into arbitrarily complex objects on the fly, even objects that it has never seen before. It is called sequence memory because the building blocks (minicolums) of the objects are also nodes in highly predictive sequences. Like pattern memory, sequence memory is a hierarchical, feedforward, multilayer, unsupervised, spiking neural network. The bottom layer receives input signals directly from pattern memory. Every layer in the hierarchy, except the top layer, sends outputs to the layer right above it.

Sequence memory consists of a large number of work-alike neuronal structures called cortical columns or macrocolumns. The main function of cortical columns is to detect unique combinations of patterns as they occur. Each column consists on average of 100 minicolumns, each of which attempts to learn a unique pattern combination.
Note: I modified the cortical column diagram that I used in the previous article to better show all the inputs, outputs and feedback connections.
Cortical Column with 5 Minicolumns
As seen above, every minicolumn has 1 feedforward output and 7 inputs (6 associate inputs and 1 primary input). The primary input of a cortical column is the only input that is common to all the minicolumns within that column. Inputs to a column originate from either pattern memory or another level in the sequence hierarchy. Outputs are connected to the level immediately above if any. Every input or output connection is paired with a feedback connection. This means that each minicolumn has 1 feedback input connection (green) from the layer immediately above its own and 7 output feedback connections (blue) that send signals down the hierarchy.

Learning in Sequence Memory

Learning in sequence memory is not about finding sequences but about finding pattern combinations around a central or primary pattern. These combinations are stored in the minicolumns. Once a minicolumn is populated and operational, it can become an actual node in a sequence or even in multiple sequences (topic for a future post). The learning process assumes that the following conditions are met:
  • There is an existing population of cortical columns waiting for input connections.
  • There are a number of pattern detectors or minicolumns that have no output connections.
Here are the learning rules:
  • A small percentage of inputs from either pattern detectors or minicolumns are chosen randomly to be the primary inputs of the cortical columns. The rest will be associate inputs.
  • A pattern detector or minicolumn can only make one output connection to a target minicolumn.
  • Within any column, learning advances one minicolumn at a time.
  • Only perfect pattern signals are used for learning.
  • A signal from a minicolumn is considered good enough if the equivalent of two or more of its connections fired.
  • An input connection to a minicolumn immediately passes the test if it fires concurrently with all existing inputs on that minicolumn.
  • Once a minicolumn has acquired all seven inputs, it is considered mature and learning continues with another minicolumn in the parent column. Unless they are located at the top level, fully populated minicolumns send their output connections up the hierarchy where the same learning method is used.
Keep in mind that this learning method will make bad connections every once in a while. As I explained in the previous article, the brain gets rid of bad cortical connections during REM sleep.


Learning in sequence memory is extremely fast for several reasons. First, a connection needs only pass the concurrence test once. Second, the connection is not severed if it fails the test; it can be tested on the same minicolumn multiple times. Finally, a huge number of connections can be tested simultaneously. The requirement that a minicolumn fires if only an equivalent of 2 or more of its input connections fire is very powerful. This is what allows us to recognize abstract art and see objects in the clouds. How the equivalence is computed is slightly more complicated than it sounds but I'll leave that to a future post. Stay tuned.

See Also:

Solving the Mysteries of Reciprocal Corticothalamic Feedback and Cortical Learning

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Solving the Mysteries of Reciprocal Corticothalamic Feedback and Cortical Learning


Neurobiologists have observed (see references at bottom) that neurons in the thalamus, the part of the brain that receives input connections from the body's sensors, not only send output connections to cortical columns in the cerebral cortex, but receive reciprocal feedback inputs from the same columns. No one knows why this happens. What follows is a novel hypothesis that explains the function of the corticothalamic feedback connections as an essential part of the mechanism of sensory perception and learning.
Important note: I am neither a neurobiologist nor a neuroscientist. I get almost all my understanding of the brain by deciphering ancient Judeo-Christian occult texts. If this bothers you, then this article is obviously not meant for you. Sorry.
A Model of the Perceptual System of the Brain and the Cortex

In order to understand why the brain's perceptual system uses feedback signals, it is essential to have an idea of what it is trying to do, how it is organized and the function of its subsystems.

The diagram above is the hypothesized perceptual model. It posits that the thalamus (pattern memory) is where the brain stores a huge number of elementary pattern detectors. These send their output signals directly to the cortex (sequence memory) where they connect to a myriad neuronal structures called minicolumns. These are contained inside bigger structures called cortical columns. There are approximately 100 million cortical columns in the human brain and each has 100 minicolumns on average. Each minicolum consists of 6 associate inputs and 1 primary input. The role of a cortical column is to learn as many pattern combinations as possible. Every connected minicolumn in a column is a different manifestation of the primary input of the column. The green arrow in the diagram represents the feedback signals that return to the origins of the feedforward signals, which are the pattern detectors in the thalamus. The number of feedback connections is equal to that of the feedforward connections.

Cortical columns (see previous article) are arranged in a feedforward hierarchy of up to 20 levels or regions. Pattern signals arrive at the bottom or entry level and percolate up the hierarchy as far as they can go. The activation of a topmost minicolumn signifies that a complex object or pattern has been detected. Normally, many top minicolumns in the hierarchy will fire simultaneously depending on the complexity of the object. Think of an object as a mountain with many peaks and plateaus. How they are clustered together to form a single object is the subject of a future article. Keep in my mind that the exact composition of an object is not learned. It is composed instantly even if the brain have never seen it before.
3D Reconstruction of 5 Cortical Columns in Rat Vibrissal Cortex
(Credit: Marcel Oberlaender et al)
What is important to realize is that pattern detection does not occur until and unless a minicolumn has fired. This is how the brain handles sensory uncertainty. The problem is that pattern signals arriving from the thalamus are rarely perfect due to occlusions, noise and other accidents. The minicolumns are, likewise, rarely perfect. The brain solves the uncertainty problem by using a threshold level in its minicolumn that must be reached or surpassed in order to warrant a detection event. When this happens, a topmost minicolumn emits a feedback signal that quickly cascades down the hierarchy one level at a time, branching out as it does, all the way down to the source pattern detectors in the thalamus. The signal branches out because every one of the 7 inputs to a minicolumn is paired with a reciprocal feedback output directed down the hierarchy. In other words, when a minicolumn fires or receives a feedback signal from above, it immediately outputs 7 feedback signals down the hierarchy. This grows exponentially at each level.

Solving the Mystery of Reciprocal Corticothalamic Feedback

Two questions comes to mind. First, why does the cortex use feedback signals? Second, why must the feedback signals travel all the way down into the thalamus? Why type questions are always the best. The answers we are looking for in this case depend on gaining a good understanding of the cortical learning process:

Reciprocal Corticothalamic Feedback
  • The most important reason for having feedback signals, as explained earlier, is that this is the fastest and most energy-efficient way to solve the uncertainty problem. The solution is to enlist the contribution of many parallel inputs during the detection process. A high enough number of signals arriving at a topmost minicolumn is enough to overcome uncertainty. Contrary to common wisdom, the brain is not a probability thinker but a cause-effect thinker. The brain assumes a perfect and deterministic world. When we recognize grandma, it's not 50% or 90% grandma. It's either grandma or no grandma.
  • The cortex is is the seat of episodic memory. When a minicolumn receives a feedback signal, it immediately records a memory trace and the time of the activation. This is crucial because this recording affords us not only a way to recall past events but also makes it possible to predict the future. Of course, the memory trace dissipates quickly unless it is rehearsed repeatedly.
  • Learning in the cortex consists of forming pattern combinations one minicolumn at a time. It is important that learning be as fast as possible. Random inputs are connected to a minicolumn and tested to see if they arrive concurrently. If an input passes the test only once, it immediately becomes a permanent connection. While this learning method is very fast, it can result in erroneous connections because of chance occurrences. There must be a way to correct the errors.
  • The error correction method is straightforward. Every time a minicolumn receives a feedback signal, it strengthens every input connection that just received a strong enough signal. Bad input connections that do not fire on time rarely get strengthened and so remain weak. However, these bad connections are not severed immediately. This happens at night during REM sleep.
  • Finally, the reason that the thalamus receives feedback signals is that connections to the first level of the cortical hierarchy are learned in the thalamus. The reason for this is that learning (searching for viable connections) in the thalamus is faster and easier due to the sheer number of pattern neurons. The thalamic connections must also be strengthened by feedback signals and disconnected during REM sleep if they don't behave as expected and are therefore weak.

To sum up, feedback signals are an integral part of the brain's cortical learning mechanism and its ability to process imperfect sensory signals. In the cortex, they contribute to episodic memory. In the thalamus, their only function is to strengthen good connections and disconnect bad ones. In a future article, I will go over how the cortex clusters large numbers of minicolumns to form invariant objects or concepts. Clusters are also part of the brain's attention mechanism.
And I answered the second time and said to him, “What are the two olive branches (clusters) which are beside the two golden pipes, which empty the golden oil from themselves?” (Zechariah 4:12)
See Also:

Feedback Connections to the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Cortical Response Properties
Emerging views of corticothalamic function
Stuff I've Been Working on: The Cortical Column
Fast Unsupervised Pattern Learning Using Spike Timing